<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MMB &#8212; A New Term in the ASME Y14.5 Standard</title>
	<link>http://gdtseminars.com/blog/2009/07/30/mmb-a-new-term-in-the-asme-y145-standard/</link>
	<description>Geometric Dimensioning &#38; Tolerancing tips, questions and issues</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 12:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: John-Paul Belanger</title>
		<link>http://gdtseminars.com/blog/2009/07/30/mmb-a-new-term-in-the-asme-y145-standard/#comment-444</link>
		<dc:creator>John-Paul Belanger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://gdtseminars.com/blog/2009/07/30/mmb-a-new-term-in-the-asme-y145-standard/#comment-444</guid>
		<description>That's right, John.  In fact, a certain automaker that I do a lot of GD&#038;T work with used to have their own modifier which was a circled V.  This could be used after a feature-of-size datum to indicate virtual condition.  But it got to be too confusing because the national standard had M as meaning virtual condition.

So it's really just semantics...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s right, John.  In fact, a certain automaker that I do a lot of GD&#038;T work with used to have their own modifier which was a circled V.  This could be used after a feature-of-size datum to indicate virtual condition.  But it got to be too confusing because the national standard had M as meaning virtual condition.</p>
<p>So it&#8217;s really just semantics&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Mahoney</title>
		<link>http://gdtseminars.com/blog/2009/07/30/mmb-a-new-term-in-the-asme-y145-standard/#comment-443</link>
		<dc:creator>John Mahoney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 23:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://gdtseminars.com/blog/2009/07/30/mmb-a-new-term-in-the-asme-y145-standard/#comment-443</guid>
		<description>This is same basic concept as virtual condition rolled up into the MMC Concept when it applies to a datum feature of size modified with th M.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is same basic concept as virtual condition rolled up into the MMC Concept when it applies to a datum feature of size modified with th M.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt</title>
		<link>http://gdtseminars.com/blog/2009/07/30/mmb-a-new-term-in-the-asme-y145-standard/#comment-380</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://gdtseminars.com/blog/2009/07/30/mmb-a-new-term-in-the-asme-y145-standard/#comment-380</guid>
		<description>Great explanation.  Thank you.  Even after reading the standard 3 times I did not understand this topic quite as clearly as I do now.

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great explanation.  Thank you.  Even after reading the standard 3 times I did not understand this topic quite as clearly as I do now.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Grant</title>
		<link>http://gdtseminars.com/blog/2009/07/30/mmb-a-new-term-in-the-asme-y145-standard/#comment-324</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 16:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://gdtseminars.com/blog/2009/07/30/mmb-a-new-term-in-the-asme-y145-standard/#comment-324</guid>
		<description>I found this to be very informative.  As a product instructor for CMM's and Vision products it is imperative that we have a good working grasp of these conceps.

Jacob Grant</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found this to be very informative.  As a product instructor for CMM&#8217;s and Vision products it is imperative that we have a good working grasp of these conceps.</p>
<p>Jacob Grant</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
